4.7 Article

Local Backbone Geometry Plays a Critical Role in Determining Conformational Preferences of Amino Acid Residues in Proteins

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12091184

关键词

propensity scales; (NCC)-C-alpha angle; secondary structure; (phi,psi) torsion angles; Ramachandran plot

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the structural basis of conformational preferences of genetically encoded amino acid residues, revealing that different regions of the Ramachandran plot may exhibit similar or anticorrelated amino acid propensities.
The definition of the structural basis of the conformational preferences of the genetically encoded amino acid residues is an important yet unresolved issue of structural biology. In order to gain insights into this intricate topic, we here determined and compared the amino acid propensity scales for different (phi, psi) regions of the Ramachandran plot and for different secondary structure elements. These propensities were calculated using the Chou-Fasman approach on a database of non-redundant protein chains retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. Similarities between propensity scales were evaluated by linear regression analyses. One of the most striking and unexpected findings is that distant regions of the Ramachandran plot may exhibit significantly similar propensity scales. On the other hand, contiguous regions of the Ramachandran plot may present anticorrelated propensities. In order to provide an interpretative background to these results, we evaluated the role that the local variability of protein backbone geometry plays in this context. Our analysis indicates that (dis)similarities of propensity scales between different regions of the Ramachandran plot are coupled with (dis)similarities in the local geometry. The concept that similarities of the propensity scales are dictated by the similarity of the (NCC)-C-alpha angle and not necessarily by the similarity of the (phi, psi) conformation may have far-reaching implications in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据