4.7 Article

Acceptance, Hesitancy, and Refusal in Anti-COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cluster Analysis Aiming at the Typology behind These Three Concepts

期刊

VACCINES
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091496

关键词

COVID-19 vaccination; cluster analysis; behavior change; vaccine attitude; vaccine hesitancy; social norms; vaccination campaign

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study classified the Romanian public into three categories regarding attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination: pro-vaxxers, anti-vaxxers, and those without a clear opinion. Vaccine hesitancy was found in the last two clusters depending on motivation or type of hesitancy.
This paper presents the findings of a study aiming at an innovative typology of attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. The proposed typology tries to go beyond the common sociological studies who divide the public into three categories: pro-vaxxers, anti-vaxxers, and hesitants. Our purpose is obtaining a more complex typology using cluster analysis. The article is based on a nation-wide survey conducted in Romania. The sample of the survey was statistically representative to the population of Romania and was composed of 1002 participants. A k-means algorithm for classifying cases was used to identify how the studied population structures itself when it comes to attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. We see hesitancy as an expression of concern or doubt about the value or safety of the vaccination, but also as fear or dis(trust) in the authorities, or as disinterest. We found out that the Romanian public falls into three categories regarding the attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination: the non-fanatical pro-vaxxers, the anti-vaxxers, and those without a clear opinion (uninterested and/or undecided). What we usually call vaccine hesitancy can be found, depending on motivation or type of hesitancy, in both of the last two clusters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据