4.7 Review

A Systematic Review of Reported Cases of Immune Thrombocytopenia after COVID-19 Vaccination

期刊

VACCINES
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091444

关键词

COVID-19 vaccine; BNT162b2 vaccine; mRNA-1273 vaccine; Ad26.COV2-S vaccine; ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine; thrombocytopenia; immune thrombocytopenia; ITP; immune thrombocytopenic purpura; idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic review on patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) after COVID-19 vaccination revealed a higher association with mRNA vaccines and promising outcomes without reported deaths.
With the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and emergency use authorization of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, reports of post-vaccine immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have gained attention. With this systematic review, we aim to analyze the clinical characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes of patients presenting with ITP after receiving COVID-19 vaccination. Medline, Embase, and Ebsco databases were systematically explored from inception until 1 June 2022. Case reports and case series investigating the association between the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and ITP were included. We found a total of 66 patients. The mean age of presentation was 63 years with a female preponderance (60.6%). Sixteen patients had pre-existing ITP. The mean time from vaccine administration to symptom onset was 8.4 days. More ITP events were triggered by mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 (n = 29) > mRNA-1273 (n = 13)) than with adenoviral vaccines (ChAdOx1-S AstraZeneca (n = 15) > Ad26.COV2-S (n = 9)). Most of the patients were treated with steroids or IVIG, or both. The overall outcome was promising, with no reported deaths. Our review attempts to increase awareness among physicians while evaluating patients presenting with thrombocytopenia after receiving the vaccine. In our solicited opinion, the rarity of these events and excellent outcomes for patients should not change views regarding the benefits provided by immunization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据