4.7 Article

Thermosensitive hydrogel loaded with concentrated growth factors promote bone repair in segmental bone defects

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1039117

关键词

bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; concentrate growth factor; hydrogel; bone defects; bone generation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee
  3. [81870785]
  4. [82071134]
  5. [22ZR1437600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of CGFs-loaded hydrogel on BMSCs and the reconstruction of critical-size bone defects. The results show that the hydrogel promotes the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in vitro, and induces bone healing and reconstruction of medullary cavity structure in vivo.
Treating critical-size bone defects beyond the body's self-healing capacity is a challenging clinical task. In this study, we investigate the effect of concentrate growth factors (CGFs) loaded Poloxamer 407 hydrogel on the viability and osteogenic differentiation potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and reconstruction of critical-size bone defects. In vitro, this CGFs-loaded thermosensitive hydrogel can significantly promote proliferation, maintain cell viability, and induce osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by up-regulating the mineralization and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, as well as gene markers, including runt-related transcription factor-2 (Runx-2), type I collagen (Col-1), osteocalcin (OCN), as well as osteopontin (OPN). In vivo, Micro-CT radiography analysis and histological detection demonstrated that the CGFs-loaded hydrogel significantly induced bone healing and reconstructed the medullary cavity structure in critical-size bone defect models. In conclusion, this strategy of transplantation of CGFs-loaded hydrogel promoted bone regeneration and prevented bone nonunion, so as to provide basis for clinical treatment for repairing critical-size bone defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据