4.6 Article

Pollen-Inspired Photonic Barcodes with Prickly Surface for Multiplex Exosome Capturing and Screening

期刊

RESEARCH
卷 2022, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.34133/2022/9809538

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFA0908200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22002018, 21902024]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180408]
  4. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021B1515120054]
  5. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program [JCYJ20190813152616459, JCYJ20210324133214038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pollen-inspired photonic crystal barcodes with prickly surface have been developed to effectively capture and screen exosomes, improving detection sensitivity and enabling multiplex detection. These barcodes are ideal for exosome analysis in medical diagnosis.
Exosomes, which play an important role in intercellular communication, are closely related to the pathogenesis of disease. However, their effective capture and multiplex screening are still challenging. Here, inspired by the unique structure of pollens, we present novel photonic crystal (PhC) barcodes with prickly surface by hydrothermal synthesis for multiplex exosome capturing and screening. These pollen-inspired PhC barcodes are imparted with extremely high specific surface area and excellent prickly surface nanostructures, which can improve the capture rate and detection sensitivity of exosomes. As the internal periodic structures are kept during the hydrothermal synthesis process, the pollen-inspired PhC barcodes exhibit obvious and stable structural colors for identification, which enables multiplex detection of exosomes. Thus, the pollen-inspired PhC barcodes can not only effectively capture and enrich cancer-related exosomes but also support multiplex screening of exosomes with high sensitivity. These features make the prickly PhC barcodes ideal for the analysis of exosomes in medical diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据