4.6 Article

An Assisted Diagnosis System for Detection of Early Pulmonary Nodule in Computed Tomography Images

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0669-0

关键词

Computer aided diagnosis (CAD); Pulmonary nodule detection; Ensemble classifier; LIDC

资金

  1. National 863 project of China [SS2015AA020109]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502472, 31300816]
  3. STS from Chinese Academy of Sciences [JCYJ20140417113430655, JCYJ20140417113430619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is still the most concerned disease around the world. Lung nodule generates in the pulmonary parenchyma which indicates the latent risk of lung cancer. Computer-aided pulmonary nodules detection system is necessary, which can reduce diagnosis time and decrease mortality of patients. In this study, we have proposed a new computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system for detection of early pulmonary nodule, which can help radiologists quickly locate suspected nodules and make judgments. This system consists of four main sections: pulmonary parenchyma segmentation, nodule candidate detection, features extraction (total 22 features) and nodule classification. The publicly available data set created by the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) is used for training and testing. This study selects 6400 slices from 80 CT scans containing totally 978 nodules, which is labeled by four radiologists. Through a fast segmentation method proposed in this paper, pulmonary nodules including 888 true nodules and 11,379 false positive nodules are segmented. By means of an ensemble classifier, Random Forest (RF), this study acquires 93.2, 92.4, 94.8, 97.6% of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), respectively. Compared with support vector machine (SVM) classifier, RF can reduce more false positive nodules and acquire larger AUC. With the help of this CAD system, radiologist can be provided with a great reference for pulmonary nodule diagnosis timely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据