4.5 Article

Influence of windward versus leeward settings on microplastic distribution in beach sediments of Kish Island, Gulf region

期刊

REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2022.102585

关键词

Marine anthropogenic litter; Microplastic; Pollution; Coastal area; Beach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two beaches from Kish Island were compared in terms of their microplastics (MPs) load. The study found that the concentrations of MPs near the beaches were relatively high and mainly originated from outside the island. The presence of small synthetic fibers was less common in the upwind beach.
Two beaches from Kish Island were compared with respect to their microplastics (MPs) load, by combining well established sedimentological methods with microplastic (MP) extraction by an oxidative procedure and subsequent density separation using ZnCl2 solution. One beach (Site A) is located upwind experiencing low tourist pressure, while the other one (Site B) is a highly frequented tourist beach which is located downwind. Generally, the concentrations vary from 530.00 +/- 14.14 to 580.00 +/- 84.85 particles/kg, and thus are in the range of values reported from elsewhere, but on the higher side. The quantity of MPs was not substantially different between the two areas; particle sizes are larger upwind. Overall the extracted MPs are secondary particles (65.5%), dominated by fragments, followed in abundance by fibers (23.5%). Granules (6%) and films (5%) were less commonly observed. This distribution is in contrary to reports of beaches elsewhere where fibers are by far dominant. The present study points to dominant sources of MPs outside the island, being transported to Kish Island by marine pathways, where further wind-driven transport leads to an absence of small synthetic fibers in the windward setting (Site A). The present study provides an initial evaluation of MP pollution in beach sediments of Kish Island, and in the region of the eastern Gulf. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据