4.7 Article

Analysing Airflow Velocity in the Canopy to Improve Droplet Deposition for Air-Assisted Spraying: A Case Study on Pears

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12102424

关键词

air-assisted spraying; canopy; wind demand criteria; spraying effectiveness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32171905]
  2. Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund [CX203172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the variations in airflow attenuation in the inner canopy using pear trees as an example. It determines a suitable inner canopy airflow end velocity (ICAEV) for air-assisted application by examining mist droplet formation, and validates the findings in the field.
The suitability of airflow velocity in airborne spraying operations in orchards is mostly evaluated on the basis of inlet and outlet based on the airflow velocity at the canopy. However, the airflow velocity required to penetrate into the inner layer of the canopy, which is prone to pests and diseases, is still unclear due to variation in the geometry of the plant canopies. In this study, pear trees were selected as an example to explore the variations in the law of airflow attenuation in the inner canopy. Furthermore, we examine mist droplet formation in the inner canopy to determine a suitable inner canopy airflow end velocity (ICAEV) for air-assisted application. We also conducted a field validation test. The results showed that the majority of airflow velocity loss occurred in the middle and outer part of the canopy; rapid decline of airflow occurred in the 0-0.3 m section, whereas the slow decline of airflow occurred in the 0.3-0.8 m section. When the ICAEV is in the range of 2.70-3.18 m/s, the spraying effect is better. The droplet deposition variation coefficient was 42.25% compared with 51.25% in the conventional airflow delivery mode. Additionally, the droplet drift was reduced by 12.59 mu g/cm(2). The results of this study can identify a suitable ICAEV for air-assisted spraying in orchards.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据