4.7 Article

Assessing the Population Structure of Colorado Potato Beetle Populations in Croatia Using Genetic and Geometric Morphometric Tools

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12102361

关键词

Leptinotarsa decemlineata; invasive species; population structure; genetic variability; phenotypic plasticity

资金

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2016-06-7458]
  2. Young Researchers' Career Development Project for the training of new doctoral students [DOK-01-2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is the first attempt to investigate the population structure of Colorado potato beetle (CPB) in Croatia. The research found that there is low genetic and phenotypic variability in CPB populations, and there exists a single panmictic population in the study area adapted to different environmental conditions.
The Colorado potato beetle (CPB, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) is one of the most successful invasive species worldwide. It has been present in Croatia since 1947, where it has caused significant damage to potato plants and developed resistance to several insecticides. Our study is the first attempt to investigate the population structure of CPBs in Croatia. SNP and GM techniques provided us with data about the population structure of the CPB population. A Bayesian model-based clustering algorithm implemented in STRUCTURE, principal component analysis (PCA), and discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) were used to analyze the genetic structure of CPBs. For the morphometric analysis, the hindwing shape of the same CPB individuals was examined using wing venation patterns. We detected the low genetic and phenotypic variabilities of CPB populations and the presence of a single panmictic population in the study area, well adapted to different environmental conditions, indicating high phenotypic plasticity. Due to such exceptional adaptation of the CPB population, it is necessary to implement an area-wide approach in future pest control management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据