4.7 Article

Screening of Heat-Tolerant Indica Rice Varieties in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12102462

关键词

Oryza sativa; high temperature; variety screening; yield

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32101822]
  2. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2108085QC109]
  3. Young Talents Program of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences [QNYC-201904]
  4. Discipline leading talents Program of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences [LJRC-202102]
  5. Anhui Provincial Special Project for Transformation and application of agricultural Scientific and Technological Achievements [2021ZH001]
  6. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0300106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the impact of high-temperature stress on rice yields by analyzing meteorological data from Anhui Province. It identifies five indica rice varieties with strong high-temperature tolerance suitable for planting in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.
Rice growth is constantly challenged by severe environmental conditions, especially high-temperature stress, brought about by global warming. How to increase rice yields is a current issue in many countries. By analyzing the meteorological data from Anhui Province over the past 60 years, the frequency and level of high-temperature damage were comprehensively analyzed. On this basis, five indica rice varieties with strong high-temperature tolerance, relatively high yield and stable yield were selected by laboratory-simulated high-temperature and field high-temperature experiments: Longliangyou Huazan (LLYHZ), 9you-6 (9Y-6), Longliangyou-1988 (LLY-1988), Fengliangyou-4 (FLY-4) and Huanghuazan (HHZ). These are suitable for planting in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. This study provides a theoretical reference and scientific basis for the study of rice tolerance to high-temperature stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据