4.5 Article

Differences of Physicochemical Properties Between Chalky and Translucent Parts of Rice Grains

期刊

RICE SCIENCE
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 577-588

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2022.03.002

关键词

chalkiness; starch structure; water state; pasting property; gelatinization characteristic

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32172080, 31971925]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-01-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the differences between chalky and translucent rice flour were investigated. Chalky flour had lower amylose and protein contents, looser starch granule morphology, higher relative crystallinity, and different water states compared to translucent flour. The findings suggest that starch granule morphology is a more indicative attribute of pasting and gelatinization properties in chalky and translucent parts of rice grains.
Rice grain chalkiness is an important characteristic, but the difference between chalky and translucent parts in grains is still unclear. Here, we investigated the differences of flour made from the chalky or translucent part of rice grains in three indica and three japonica rice varieties. The chalky flour had significantly lower amylose and protein contents and looser starch granule morphology, and starches in the chalky flour had higher relative crystallinity, higher short chain content but lower long chain content than those in the translucent flour. The water states, determined with nuclear magnetic resonance, differed between the chalky and translucent flour after soaking, cooking and retrograding, and the chalky flour had more bound and free water but less constructural water than the translucent flour. Mostly, the chalky flour had lower viscosity and shorter gel consistency, but higher onset temperature and gelatinization enthalpy than the translucent flour. The results indicated that starch granule morphology would be more indicative than other attributions on pasting and gelatinization properties of chalky and translucent parts of rice grains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据