Limitations of Spatial Judgment Bias Test Application in Horses (Equus ferus caballus)

Simple Summary Public awareness about animal welfare is increasing and new research interest in this field is the evaluation of affective states. This research aimed to highlight possible limitations in the application of a spatial judgment bias test for the assessment of affective states in horses, considering the influence of personality traits, stress levels, and the structure of the test. Horses were trained to distinguish between a positive position, where they found a bucket with food reward, and a negative position where the bucket was empty. The training ended when the subjects approached the positive position faster than the negative one. Then, three ambiguous positions (Near Positive, Middle, Near Negative) were presented to them, and the latency to reach these three positions allowed their classification as pessimistic or optimistic. Our results showed that some personality traits can influence horses' responses to ambiguous cues. In addition, the spatial nature of such a test seems inappropriate for horses, which use lateralization when evaluating new objects. Therefore, this preliminary study suggested that this type of test should be modified considering species-specific and individual peculiarities. Affective states are of increasing interest in the assessment of animal welfare. This research aimed to evaluate the possible limitations in the application of a spatial judgment bias test (JBT) in horses, considering the influence of stress level, personality traits, and the possible bias due to the test structure itself. The distinction between two positions, one rewarded (Positive) and the other not (Negative), was learned by 10 horses and 4 ponies,. Then, the latency to reach three unrewarded ambiguous positions (Near Positive, Middle, Near Negative) was measured. Furthermore, the validated Equine Behavior Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ) was employed to assess personality traits. Fecal and hair cortisol levels were measured through radioimmunoassay (RIA), and the frequency of behavioral stress indicators was recorded. Results showed that horses that had the rewarded position (Positive) on the right approached Near Negative and Middle faster than those that had Positive on the left. Certain personality traits influenced the latency to reach Middle and Near Positive, but chronic stress did not seem to affect horses' judgment bias. This preliminary study highlighted several limitations in the employment of spatial JBT for the assessment of affective state in horses and that personality traits can partially influence the cognitive process. Further research is needed to refine the use of this test in horses, considering the peculiarities both of species and of individuals.

Automated summary

This research aimed to evaluate the limitations of applying a spatial judgment bias test in assessing affective states in horses, considering the influence of stress level, personality traits, and the test structure itself. Results showed that personality traits can partially influence horses' cognitive processes, and the spatial nature of the test may not be suitable for horses.