4.6 Review

Antidiabetic Medicinal Plants Used in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa: An Updated Review

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10091817

关键词

antidiabetic drugs; medicinal plants; diabetes mellitus; eastern cape; hyperglycaemia; hypoglycaemia

资金

  1. Cape Peninsula University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of medicinal plants for the management of diabetes has been increasing in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa due to their cultural acceptability, accessibility, affordability, efficacy, and safety claims. This study conducted a comprehensive review of antidiabetic medicinal plants used in the region and identified several promising species for further scientific investigation.
Oral antidiabetic drugs are usually costly and are associated with several adverse side effects. This has led to the use of medicinal plants that are considered to have multiple therapeutic targets and are readily accessible. In the Eastern Cape province of South Africa, the number of people using medicinal plants for the management of diabetes has been climbing steadily over the past two decades due to their cultural acceptability, accessibility, affordability, efficacy, and safety claims. In this study, a review of antidiabetic medicinal plants used in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa was conducted. A comprehensive literature survey was thoroughly reviewed using several scientific databases, ethnobotanical books, theses and dissertations. About forty-eight (48) plant species were identified as being used to treat diabetes by the people of Eastern Cape province. Among the plant species, only eight (8) species have not been scientifically evaluated for their antidiabetic activities and twenty antidiabetic compounds were isolated from these medicinal plants. This review has confirmed the use and potential of the antidiabetic medicinal plants in the Eastern Cape province and identified several promising species for further scientific investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据