4.6 Article

TAFA4-IL-10 axis potentiate immunotherapy for airway allergy by induction of specific regulatory T cells

期刊

NPJ VACCINES
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-022-00559-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature and Science Foundation of China [32090052, 82071807, 81900914]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Immunity and Diseases [2019B030301009]
  3. Shenzhen science, technology, and innovation committee [KQTD20170331145453160, KQJSCX20180328095619081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) in experimental allergic rhinitis (AR) by using TAFA4 as an adjuvant. The results show that TAFA4 activates dendritic cells (DCs) in the airway tissues and induces the expression of IL-10, which attenuates the allergic response in mice.
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the main treatment for allergic diseases. The therapeutic efficacy of AIT has to be improved. Neuropeptides, such as TAFA4, have immune-regulating features. The objective of this study is to promote the efficacy of AIT in experimental allergic rhinitis (AR) by the concurrent use of TAFA chemokine as a family member 4 (TAFA4). In this study, an AR mouse model was developed using ovalbumin (OVA) as the specific antigen. The AR response was assessed in mice after treatment with AIT or/and TAFA4. We found that exposure to TAFA4 activated dendritic cells (DCs) in the airway tissues. Activation of DC by TAFA4 resulted in the expression of IL-10. TAFA4 also promoted the activities of c-Maf inducing protein. The FPR1-MyD88-AKT signal pathway was associated with the TAFA4-induced Il10 expression in the DCs. Co-administration of AIT/TAFA4 attenuated the AR response in mice by inducing antigen-specific Tr1 cells. In conclusion, TAFA4 induces the expression of IL-10 in DCs. Acting as an adjuvant, TAFA4 significantly improves AIT's therapeutic efficacy against AR by inducing antigen-specific Tr1 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据