4.7 Article

Development of antimicrobial films with cinnamaldehyde stabilized by ethyl lauroyl arginate and cellulose nanocrystals

期刊

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100886

关键词

Cellulose nanocrystals; Pickering emulsion; Food packaging; Antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project [1012359]
  2. University of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station and AgResearch
  3. Oak Ridge Associated Universities Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Awards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed antimicrobial films by incorporating CNC and cinnamaldehyde-based Pickering emulsions into polyvinyl alcohol, with the modification of CNC by ethyl lauroyl arginate to improve emulsion stability. The films showed significant inhibition of microbial growth and reduced deterioration rate of strawberries with 2% emulsion added.
Antimicrobial films were developed by incorporating cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and cinnamaldehyde-based Pickering emulsions into polyvinyl alcohol. The food-grade cationic surfactant, ethyl lauroyl arginate (LAE), was used to modify CNC for emulsion stability improvement. We contend that the LAE reduced the electrostatic repulsion by partially neutralizing the CNC surface charge and increased its packing density around the droplet interface. The CNC/LAE and cinnamaldehyde mixture formed an oil-in-water Pickering emulsion with an average droplet size of 5.54 mu m. The emulsion-added films led to significant inhibition of microbial growth of E. coli, S. aureus, and B. cinerea. Moreover, there was no significant adverse effect on the films' mechanical properties, water vapor permeability, or solubility with 1% and 2% emulsions added. Lastly, the antimicrobial films with 2% emulsion inhibited the deterioration rate of strawberries by 52.2%. The CNC-LAE-cinnamaldehyde Pickering emulsions-added films demonstrate a promising application for antimicrobial food packagings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据