4.7 Article

Development of In Situ Microfluidic System for Preparation of Controlled Porous Microsphere for Tissue Engineering

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112345

关键词

microfluidics; porous microsphere; controlled pore; cell delivery; inflammation

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT)
  3. Korea Government
  4. [NRF-2020R1A4A1018652]
  5. [NRF-2017R1A6A1A03015562]
  6. [NRF-2019R1I1A1A01063257]
  7. [20010984]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an in situ microfluidic system for precise control of highly porous polycaprolactone microspheres in tissue engineering. The microspheres' porosity was controlled by adjusting the flow rates. Results showed that increased pore sizes improved cell proliferation rate and reduced inflammation response after implantation.
In this study, we present an in situ microfluidic system to precisely control highly porous polycaprolactone microspheres as tissue templates for tissue engineering. The porosity of the microspheres was controlled by adjusting the flow rates of the polymer phase and the pore-generating material phase in the dispersed phase. The microfluidic flow-focusing technique was adopted to manufacture porous microspheres using a relatively highly viscous polymer solution, and the device was fabricated by conventional photolithography and PDMS casting. The fabricated in situ microfluidic system was used to precisely control the pore size of monodispersed polycaprolactone microspheres. The porous microspheres with controlled pore sizes were evaluated by culturing HDF cells on the surface of porous microspheres and injection into the subcutaneous tissue of rats. We found that the increased pore size of the microspheres improved the initial proliferation rate of HDF cells after seeding and relieved the inflammatory response after the implantation of porous microspheres in the subcutaneous tissue of rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据