4.7 Article

A Microfluidic Device for Long-Term Maintenance of Organotypic Liver Cultures

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202201121

关键词

hepatocytes; liver; microfluidics; organotypic cultures; organs-on-a-chip

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver cultures have evolved from hepatocyte monocultures to more complex co-cultures and precision-cut liver slices. This study presents a microfluidic device that allows for longer-term maintenance of functional organotypic liver cultures, displaying promising potential for disease modeling and individualized therapies.
Liver cultures may be used for disease modeling, testing therapies, and predicting drug-induced injury. The complexity of the liver cultures has evolved from hepatocyte monocultures to co-cultures with non-parenchymal cells and finally to precision-cut liver slices. The latter culture format retains liver's native biomolecular and cellular complexity and therefore holds considerable promise for in vitro testing. However, liver slices remain functional for approximate to 72 h in vitro and display limited utility for some disease modeling and therapy testing applications that require longer culture times. This paper describes a microfluidic device for longer-term maintenance of functional organotypic liver cultures. This microfluidic culture system is designed to enable direct injection of liver tissue into a culture chamber through a valve-enabled side port. Liver tissue is embedded in collagen and remained functional for up to 31 days, highlighted by continued production of albumin and urea. These organotypic cultures also express several enzymes involved in xenobiotic metabolism. Conversely, matched liver tissue embedded in collagen in a 96-well plate loses its phenotype and function within 3-5 days. The microfluidic organotypic liver cultures described here represent a significant advance in liver cultivation and may be used for future modeling of liver diseases or for individualized liver-directed therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据