4.6 Review

Chromosomal Heteromorphisms and Cancer Susceptibility Revisited

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11203239

关键词

heteromorphism; copy number variation; banding cytogenetics; molecular cytogenetics; cancer; tumor; satellite DNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromosomal heteromorphisms (CHs) are part of genetic variation in humans. Recent research has raised questions about the potential role of CHs in cancer susceptibility. However, the current routine cytogenetic analysis does not give CHs sufficient consideration, which highlights the need for more attention in future research, particularly in the study of solid tumors.
Chromosomal heteromorphisms (CHs) are a part of genetic variation in man. The past literature largely posited whether CHs could be correlated with the development of malignancies. While this possibility seemed closed by end of the 1990s, recent data have raised the question again on the potential influences of repetitive DNA elements, the main components of CHs, in cancer susceptibility. Such new evidence for a potential role of CHs in cancer can be found in the following observations: (i) amplification and/or epigenetic alterations of CHs are routinely reported in tumors; (ii) the expression of CH-derived RNA in embryonal and other cells under stress, including cancer cells; (iii) the expression of parts of CH-DNA as long noncoding RNAs; plus (iv) theories that suggest a possible application of the two-hit model for euchromatic copy number variants (CNVs). Herein, these points are discussed in detail, which leads to the conclusion that CHs are by far not given sufficient consideration in routine cytogenetic analysis, e.g., leukemias and lymphomas, and need more attention in future research settings including solid tumors. This heightened focus may only be achieved by approaches other than standard sequencing or chromosomal microarrays, as these techniques are at a minimum impaired in their ability to detect, if not blind to, (highly) repetitive DNA sequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据