4.6 Review

Bilirubin-Induced Neurological Damage: Current and Emerging iPSC-Derived Brain Organoid Models

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11172647

关键词

BIND; kernicterus; UCB; iPSCs; organoids

资金

  1. Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular mechanisms of bilirubin-induced neurological damage remain largely unknown. In order to better understand the effects of bilirubin on the liver and developing human brain, it is crucial to establish a physiologically recapitulating in vitro model. Stem-cell-derived 3D brain organoids offer a promising platform for research, drug screening, and therapeutic strategies due to their similarity to the human brain system.
Bilirubin-induced neurological damage (BIND) has been a subject of studies for decades, yet the molecular mechanisms at the core of this damage remain largely unknown. Throughout the years, many in vivo chronic bilirubin encephalopathy models, such as the Gunn rat and transgenic mice, have further elucidated the molecular basis of bilirubin neurotoxicity as well as the correlations between high levels of unconjugated bilirubin (UCB) and brain damage. Regardless of being invaluable, these models cannot accurately recapitulate the human brain and liver system; therefore, establishing a physiologically recapitulating in vitro model has become a prerequisite to unveil the breadth of complexities that accompany the detrimental effects of UCB on the liver and developing human brain. Stem-cell-derived 3D brain organoid models offer a promising platform as they bear more resemblance to the human brain system compared to existing models. This review provides an explicit picture of the current state of the art, advancements, and challenges faced by the various models as well as the possibilities of using stem-cell-derived 3D organoids as an efficient tool to be included in research, drug screening, and therapeutic strategies for future clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据