4.7 Article

HPV-Positive and -Negative Cervical Cancers Are Immunologically Distinct

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164825

关键词

human papillomavirus; cervical cancer; TCGA; gene expression; immune landscape; immune exhaustion; T-cell function; tumor immunology; neoantigens; TCR repertoire

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [PJT-173496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HPV-negative cervical cancers have distinct disease phenotypes and immune characteristics compared to HPV-positive cervical cancers. They also exhibit a higher expression of potential neoantigens.
Although infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with nearly all cervical cancers (CC), a small proportion are HPV-negative. Recently, it has become clear that HPV-negative CC represent a distinct disease phenotype compared to HPV-positive disease and exhibit increased mortality. In addition, variations between different HPV types associated with CC have been linked to altered molecular pathology and prognosis. We compared the immune microenvironments of CC caused by HPV alpha 9 species (HPV16-like), HPV alpha 7 species (HPV18-like) and HPV-negative disease. HPV-negative CC appeared distinct from other subtypes, with greatly reduced levels of lymphocyte infiltration compared to either HPV alpha 9 or alpha 7 CC. Besides reduced levels of markers indicative of B, T, and NK lymphocytes, the expression of T-cell effector molecules, activation/exhaustion markers, and T-cell receptor diversity were also significantly lower in HPV-negative CC. Interestingly, HPV-negative CC expressed much higher levels of potential neoantigens than HPV-positive CC. These results identify profound differences between the immune landscape of HPV-positive and HPV-negative CC as well as modest differences between HPV alpha 9 and alpha 7 CC. These differences may contribute to altered patient outcomes between HPV-negative and HPV-positive CC and potentially between CC associated with different HPV types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据