4.7 Article

The Impact of New Treatments on Short- and MID-Term Outcomes in Bilateral Lung Transplant: A Propensity Score Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195859

关键词

lung transplant; transplantation; ECMO; VA ECMO; tacrolimus; intensive care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the impact of 'prophylactic' veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and tacrolimus on lung transplant recipients. The results showed that 'prophylactic' VA ECMO had comparable 72-hour primary graft dysfunction (PGD) values to the 'off-pump' group, while tacrolimus was associated with a lower risk of 30-day acute cellular rejection.
Background: Despite many efforts to improve organ preservation and recipient survival, overall lung transplant (LT) mortality is still high. We aimed to investigate the impact of 'prophylactic' veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and tacrolimus on 72-h primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and 30-day acute cellular rejection, respectively. Methods: All consecutive LT patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Padua University Hospital (February, 2016-2022) were screened. Only adult patients undergoing first bilateral LT and not requiring cardio-pulmonary bypass, invasive mechanical ventilation, and/or ECMO before LT, were included. A propensity score weighting analysis was employed to account for the non-random allocation of the subjects to different treatments. Results: A total of 128 LT recipients were enrolled. Compared to the 'off-pump'-group (n.47, 37%), 'prophylactic' VA ECMO (n.51,40%) recorded similar 72-h PGD values, perioperative blood products and lower acute kidney dysfunction. Compared with cyclosporine (n.86, 67%), tacrolimus (n.42, 33%) recorded a lower risk of 30-day cellular rejection, kidney dysfunction, and bacteria isolation. Conclusions: 'Prophylactic' VA ECMO recorded 72-h PGD values comparable to the 'off-pump'-group; while tacrolimus showed a lower incidence of 30-day acute cellular rejection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据