4.7 Review

Social Deprivation, Healthcare Access and Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Narrative Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185431

关键词

diabetic foot ulcer; epidemiology; social deprivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), a common and serious complication of diabetes, is influenced by the individual's social environment and access to healthcare. Financial insecurity and social protection systems play a significant role in DFU prognosis, while the relationship between socioeconomic and socio-educational deprivations and DFU is more complex. Understanding the correlation between DFU risk and social deprivation depends on how social deprivation is calculated and how questions about the relationship are framed.
The diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common and serious complication of diabetes. There is also a strong relationship between the environment of the person living with a DFU and the prognosis of the wound. Financial insecurity seems to have a major impact, but this effect can be moderated by social protection systems. Socioeconomic and socio-educational deprivations seem to have a more complex relationship with DFU risk and prognosis. The area of residence is a common scale of analysis for DFU as it highlights the effect of access to care. Yet it is important to understand other levels of analysis because some may lead to over-interpretation of the dynamics between social deprivation and DFU. Social deprivation and DFU are both complex and multifactorial notions. Thus, the strength and characteristics of the correlation between the risk and prognosis of DFU and social deprivation greatly depend not only on the way social deprivation is calculated, but also on the way questions about the social deprivation-DFU relationship are framed. This review examines this complex relationship between DFU and social deprivation at the individual level by considering the social context in which the person lives and his or her access to healthcare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据