4.7 Article

The Usefulness of Peroral Cholangioscopy for Intrahepatic Stones

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216425

关键词

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; electrohydraulic shockwave lithotripsy; gallstone; stenosis; transpapillary treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroral Cholangioscopy (POCS) is effective in achieving complete stone removal for intrahepatic stones, but it is associated with a longer procedure time compared to fluoroscopic guidance. However, the incidence of cholangitis was not significantly different between patients with and without POCS. This study highlights the importance of specialized equipment and experienced staff for endoscopic treatment of intrahepatic stones.
Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) is believed to be effective in treating intrahepatic stones; however, reports on its efficacy are few. We reviewed the results of intrahepatic stones treated with fluoroscopic guidance or POCS. This study included 26 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for intrahepatic stones at our institution between January 2017 and December 2021. We retrospectively evaluated the procedure time and adverse events in the first session and the rate of complete stone removal. Complete stone removal was achieved in 92% (24/26); POCS was required in 16 of 26 (62%) procedures and the complete stone removal was achieved in 15 of 16 (94%) of these procedures. The POCS group had a significantly longer procedure time than the fluoroscopy group. Cholangitis incidence was high; however, no difference was noted between patients with and without POCS, and all cases were mild and treated conservatively. Endoscopic treatment for intrahepatic stones may lead to an increase in the incidence of cholangitis, requires specialized devices such as a cholangioscope, and should be performed in an established institution by experienced staff. POCS is useful for intrahepatic stones formed upstream of the stenosis and intrahepatic stones piled in the bile duct.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据