4.7 Review

Interventional Radiological Management and Prevention of Complications after Pancreatic Surgery: Drainage, Embolization and Islet Auto-Transplantation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206005

关键词

pancreatectomy; interventional radiology (IR); drainage; hemorrhage; embolization; islet of Langerhans transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the interventional radiological management of complications after pancreatic surgery, including percutaneous drainage of fluid collections, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, and transcatheter embolization (or stent-graft) for arterial bleeding. It also examines percutaneous intra-portal islet auto-transplantation for the prevention of pancreatogenic diabetes.
Pancreatic surgery still remains burdened by high levels of morbidity and mortality with a relevant incidence of complications, even in high volume centers. This review highlights the interventional radiological management of complications after pancreatic surgery. The current literature regarding the percutaneous drainage of fluid collections due to pancreatic fistulas, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage due to biliary leaks and transcatheter embolization (or stent-graft) due to arterial bleeding is analyzed. Moreover, also, percutaneous intra-portal islet auto-transplantation for the prevention of pancreatogenic diabetes in case of extended pancreatic resection is also examined. Moreover, a topic not usually treated in other similar reviewsas percutaneous intra-portal islet auto-transplantation for the prevention of pancreatogenic diabetes in case of extended pancreatic resection is also one of our areas of focus. In islet auto-transplantation, the patient is simultaneously donor and recipient. Differently from islet allo-transplantation, it does not require immunosuppression, has no risk of rejection and is usually efficient with a small number of transplanted islets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据