4.7 Review

Biomarkers for the Prediction and Judgement of Sepsis and Sepsis Complications: A Step towards precision medicine?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195782

关键词

sepsis; biomarkers; precision medicine

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [ME5413/1-1]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [ZA428/18-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sepsis and septic shock are major public health concerns, but current treatment strategies often lack precision. Biomarkers provide opportunities to improve patient care and clinical research, by predicting and evaluating these conditions. They can potentially pave the way for precision medicine in sepsis.
Sepsis and septic shock are a major public health concern and are still associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Whilst there is growing understanding of different phenotypes and endotypes of sepsis, all too often treatment strategies still only employ a one-size-fits-all approach. Biomarkers offer a unique opportunity to close this gap to more precise treatment approaches by providing insight into clinically hidden, yet complex, pathophysiology, or by individualizing treatment pathways. Predicting and evaluating systemic inflammation, sepsis or septic shock are essential to improve outcomes for these patients. Besides opportunities to improve patient care, employing biomarkers offers a unique opportunity to improve clinical research in patients with sepsis. The high rate of negative clinical trials in this field may partly be explained by a high degree of heterogeneity in patient cohorts and a lack of understanding of specific endotypes or phenotypes. Moving forward, biomarkers can support the selection of more homogeneous cohorts, thereby potentially improving study conditions of clinical trials. This may finally pave the way to a precision medicine approach to sepsis, septic shock and complication of sepsis in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据