4.8 Article

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade abrogates a dysfunctional innate-adaptive immune axis in critical beta-coronavirus disease

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 38, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn6545

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centro Latinoamericano de Biotecnologia (CABBIO) [014-01]
  2. Programme ECOS Sud, Universite Sorbonne, Paris Nord [U17S01]
  3. Fondo de Convergencia Estructural del Mercosur (FOCEM) [COF 03/11]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [FAPESP 2020/04579-7, FAPESP 2020/04558-0]
  5. Fundo de apoio ao ensino, pesquisa e extensao [FAEPEX 226/20]
  6. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e innovacion [ANII EQL_2013_X_1_2, ANII PEC_3_2019_1_158811]
  7. PEDECIBA Biologia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the correlation between inflammation and dysfunctional T cell responses, showing that manipulating T cells can control certain viral infections. These findings provide new insights for supporting immunotherapy targeting critical viral diseases.
Severe COVID-19 is associated with hyperinflammation and weak T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2. However, the links between those processes remain partially characterized. Moreover, whether and how therapeutically manipulating T cells may benefit patients are unknown. Our genetic and pharmacological evidence demonstrates that the ion channel TMEM176B inhibited inflammasome activation triggered by SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2-related murine beta-coronavirus. Tmem176b(-/-) mice infected with murine beta-coronavirus developed inflammasome-dependent T cell dysfunction and critical disease, which was controlled by modulating dysfunctional T cells with PD-1 blockers. In critical COVID-19, inflammasome activation correlated with dysfunctional T cells and low monocytic TMEM176B expression, whereas PD-L1 blockade rescued T cell functionality. Here, we mechanistically link T cell dysfunction and inflammation, supporting a cancer immunotherapy to reinforce T cell immunity in critical beta-coronavirus disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据