4.8 Article

Unlocking the in situ Li plating dynamics and evolution mediated by diverse metallic substrates in all-solid-state batteries

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add2000

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFB3800300, 2018YFE0206900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52072138, 12172143]
  3. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019CFA002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the lithium deposition behaviors on different metallic substrates using in situ micro-nano electrochemical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) manipulation platform. The research reveals distinct lithium deposition behaviors and identifies the factors that contribute to homogeneous lithium plating. The findings shed light on the design of solid-state batteries and provide a powerful SEM platform for future investigations.
The mechanisms of Li deposition behaviors, which overwhelmingly affect battery performances and safety, are far to be understood in solid-state batteries. Here, using in situ micro-nano electrochemical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) manipulation platform, dynamic Li plating behaviors on 10 metallic substrates have been tracked, and the underlying mechanisms for dendrite-free Li plating are elucidated. Distinct Li deposition behaviors on Cu, Ti, Ni, Bi, Cr, In, Ag, Au, Pd, and Al are revealed quantitatively in nucleation densities, growth rates, and anisotropic ratios. For Li alloyable metals, the dynamic Li alloying process before Li growth is visually captured. It is concluded that a good affinity for Li and appropriate lattice compatibility between the substrate and Li are needed to facilitate homogeneous Li plating. Our work not only uncovers the Li plating dynamics, shedding light on the design of solid-state batteries, but also provides a powerful integrated SEM platform for future in-depth investigation of solid-state batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据