4.8 Article

An in situ study of abyssal turbidity-current sediment plumes generated by a deep seabed polymetallic nodule mining preprototype collector vehicle

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 38, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn1219

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Particulate and Multiphase Processes program [CBET-2139277]
  2. 11th Hour Project of The Schmidt Family Foundation
  3. Benioff Ocean Initiative, ARPA-E [DE-AR0001232-MIT]
  4. Global Sea Mineral Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in situ study was conducted in the Pacific Ocean to investigate the dynamics of sediment plumes released from a deep seabed polymetallic nodule mining preprototype collector vehicle. The results show the formation of a low-lying, laterally spreading turbidity current due to the excess density of the released sediment-laden water. This process, which has been overlooked in previous modeling efforts, is found to be significant for plume modeling in environmental impact assessments.
An in situ study to investigate the dynamics of sediment plumes near the release from a deep seabed polymetallic nodule mining preprototype collector vehicle was conducted in the Clarion Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean 4500-m deep. The experiments reveal that the excess density of the released sediment-laden water leads to a low-lying, laterally spreading turbidity current. At the time of measurement, 2 to 8% of the sediment mass were detected 2 m or higher above the seabed and were not observed to settle over several hours, with the remaining 92 to 98% below 2 m and some fraction of that locally deposited. Our results suggest that turbidity current dynamics sets the fraction of sediment remaining suspended and the scale of the subsequent ambient sediment plume. The implications of this process, which is characteristically overlooked in previous modeling efforts, are substantial for plume modeling that will lie at the heart of environmental impact statements for regulatory consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据