4.6 Article

A Universal Grain Cage to Suppress Halide Segregation of Mixed-Halide Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 3467-3475

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01771

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFE0111000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22109053, 22179051, 62104136, U1802257]
  3. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A1515110548]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019B151502061]
  5. Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project [202102020775, 202102010091]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [21620348]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed a method to suppress halide segregation by constructing conjugated covalent organic frameworks. This method effectively solidifies the material structure, slows down the light-induced segregation process, and improves the efficiency and stability of solar cells.
Bandgap-tunable mixed-halide perovskites offer exciting opportunities to construct efficient multijunction tandem solar cells. However, the ion migration always causes halide segregation, which inevitably creates detrimental defects and deteriorates the photovoltaic performances. Here, we report a universal caging strategy to suppress halide segregation by in situ formation of conjugated covalent organic frameworks (COFs) catalyzed by PbX2 (X = Br and I) during the formation of mixed-halide perovskite. Through theoretical calculation and systematic investigation, the strong electron-donating feature of COFs is shown to effectively solidify the soft lattice and impede the iodide ion transport from bulk to grain boundary, decelerating the lightinduced halide-demixing process. Finally, the nonradiative recombination is significantly reduced, boosting efficiency up to 11.50% for an inorganic CsPbIBr2 perovskite solar cell and 14.35% for a CsPbI2Br cell with a prolonged shelf life and an improved photostability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据