4.6 Article

Distance-Dependent Solid Electrolyte Interphase Control by Electrochemical Pretreatment

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 3087-3094

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01390

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, EPSCoR National Laboratory Partnership Program [DE-SC0021392]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021392] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method has been investigated to control the morphology and chemical composition of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the Si anode through electrochemical pretreatment by varying the distance between electrodes. The results show that the SEI's chemical composition and structure depend on the electrode distance during electrochemical pretreatment. When the electrode distance is large (>= 2 mm), a LiF-dominant surface film with dispersed LiF nano-particles is generated, improving the electrochemical performance of the Si anode.
A new method to control the morphology and chemical composition of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the Si anode via electrochemical pretreatment with variation of the distance between the counter electrode and the working electrode has been investigated. This fundamental investigation reveals that the chemical composition and structure of the SEI are dependent on the distance between the electrodes during electrochemical pretreatment. The electrochemical pretreatment in a conventional coin cell or with a narrow gap between the electrodes (0.5 mm) generates a SEI composed of a mixture of Li2CO3 and LiF on the Si anode. However, with a large distance between the electrodes (>= 2 mm), a LiF-dominant surface film is generated with well-dispersed LiF nano -particles (<500 nm), improving the electrochemical performance of the Si anode. This finding provides insight into the potential to use distance between electrodes during electrochemical pretreatment as a method to control the structure and function of the SEI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据