4.7 Article

The study of air distribution quality in the summer section of Iranian dry climate houses equipped with wind tower

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104095

关键词

Air Change Effectiveness (ACE); Air Change Rate (ACH); Courtyard house; Indoor Air Quality (IAQ); Mean Age of air (MAA); Natural ventilation; Wind tower; catcher

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used CFD simulations and analysis of indoor air quality parameters to evaluate the ventilation effect of wind towers in traditional Iranian houses. The results showed that in hot-dry climates, the courtyard, as a secondary source of fresh air, is an effective strategy for rapid heat removal.
CFD simulations at various wind directions were performed to assess air distribution quality within a traditional Iranian dry climate house integrated with a four-sided wind tower. The house's summer room, parlor, connects the wind tower to a courtyard by its cross-openings, representing the layout of most vernacular houses in Yazd city, Iran. This study pursues the strategies applied in a traditional passive ventilation system by focusing on its interaction with adjoining architectural features and the surrounding environment.The urban terrain was simulated using Atmospheric Boundary Layer profiles and modeling the ground surface roughness. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) parameters such as Mean Age of Air, Air Change Effectiveness, and Air Change Rate were analyzed.The CFD setup was validated through scaled wind tunnel experiments and repli-cating the same conditions in CFD modeling, which showed a good agreement. Results indicate that IAQ is acceptable at around 77% of the outdoor wind angles due to the courtyard's significant influence as the sec-ondary source of fresh air, leading to quick heat removal from the environment as an effective strategy that suits the hot-arid climate. Investigating the system's failures shows that IAQ is highly dependent on the flow pattern rather than the wind tower functionality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据