4.7 Article

Antarctic krill peptides improve scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice

期刊

FOOD BIOSCIENCE
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101987

关键词

Antarctic krill; Bioactive peptide; Hippocampus; Memory impairment; Scopolamine mouse model; Protein expression level

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32022067]
  2. Dalian High-level Talent Innovation Support Program of China [2019RQ003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that Antarctic krill peptides can repair scopolamine-induced memory impairment by enhancing SOD activity and ACh level while reducing AChE and MDA levels in hippocampal neurons.
The study aims to investigate the repair effects of Ser-Ser-Asp-Ala-Phe-Phe-Pro-Phe-Arg (SSDAFFPFR) and Ser-Asn-Val-Phe-Asp-Met-Phe (SNVFDMF) peptides on scopolamine-caused memory impairment in mice. Behavioral experiments have revealed that Antarctic krill peptides can ameliorate scopolamine caused memory impairment by changing the behavior of mice. In comparison with the scopolamine group, the two peptides at a dose of 40 mg/kg could improve memory impairment. The serum SOD activity (82.82 +/- 0.19 vs 79.47 +/- 2.42 U/ mg prot) and hippocampal ACh level (101.46 +/- 3.23 vs 99.85 +/- 7.13 mu g/mg prot) of SSDAFFPFR were higher than those of SNVFDMF. Hippocampal AChE activity (0.20 +/- 0.03 vs 0.53 +/- 0.02 U/mg prot), hippocampal MDA level (1.56 & PLUSMN; 0.01 vs 1.63 & PLUSMN; 0.05 nmol/mg prot) and the serum MDA level (3.38 +/- 0.24 vs 3.88 +/- 0.21 nmol/mg prot) was lower than that of SNVFDMF. The state of mouse hippocampal cells was further observed by a microscopic imaging system. In addition, western blot analysis showed that SSDAFFPFR could significantly inhibit the expression of Bax, caspase-3, and p53, and promote the expression of BCL-XL, CREB, and BDNF, thus protecting hippocampal neurons in mice. In conclusion, the Antarctic krill peptide can repair scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据