4.5 Article

Jupiter's Sheared Flow Unstable Magnetopause Boundary Observed by Juno

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022JA030719

关键词

Juno; Jupiter's magnetosphere; Kelvin-Helmholtz instability

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC22K0310, 80NSSC19K0822, 80NSSC20K1279, 80NSSC18K1108, 80NSSC18K1381]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between the solar wind and giant magnetospheres is crucial for magnetospheric physics, with the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability playing a significant role in the low-latitude dawn side flank region of Jupiter. The occurrence of this instability can modify the magnetopause boundary layer, as confirmed by the observations from Juno's mission.
The interaction between the solar wind and giant magnetospheres (i.e., Jupiter's and Saturn's magnetospheres) is fundamentally important for magnetospheric physics, in which the viscous interaction (presumably driven by the Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instability) is often expected to play an important role. Previous simulation and theory studies suggested that Jupiter's low-latitude dawn side flank region is KH unstable due to the large sheared flow between the fast tailward solar wind and magnetospheric sunward corotational flow. The onset of the KH instability can strongly modify the magnetopause boundary layer, which is consistent with the identification of 194 boundary crossings during Juno's first 14 orbits. We applied four different boundary normal analysis methods to illustrate that there is always a wide range of local normal directions, suggesting Jupiter's dawn-side flank region is often highly perturbed. The distribution of local normal directions is insensitive to the upstream solar wind dynamic pressure, Juno's inward/outward boundary crossing direction, and the location along the z direction of the boundary crossing. We also used a 2-D magnetohydrodynamic simulation to demonstrate that such a wide distribution can be formed by the KH instability even at the beginning of the nonlinear stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据