4.7 Article

Hepatic overexpression of protein targeting to glycogen attenuates obesity and improves hyperglycemia in db/db mice

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.969924

关键词

glycogen; glucose; liver; food intake; db; ATP

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (MCIU/FEDER/AEI) [BFU2017-84345-P, PID2020-118699GB-I00]
  2. CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabolicas Asociadas (ISCIII, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion)
  3. La Marato de TV3 Foundation (Barcelona, Spain) [201613-10]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Centres of Excellence Severo Ochoa Award
  5. CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased liver glycogen content can ameliorate the phenotype of obesity and diabetes, but has no effect on lipid metabolism.
Increased liver glycogen content has been shown to reduce food intake, attenuate obesity, and improve glucose tolerance in a mouse model of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity. Here we studied the contribution of liver glycogen to the regulation of obesity and glucose metabolism in a model of type 2 diabetes and obesity, namely the db/db mouse. To this end, we crossed db/db mice with animals overexpressing protein targeting to glycogen (PTG) in the liver to generate db/db mice with increased liver glycogen content (db/db-PTG). Hepatic PTG overexpression reduced food intake and fat weight and attenuated obesity and hyperglycemia in db/db mice. Db/db-PTG mice showed similar energy expenditure and physical activity to db/db mice. PTG overexpression reduced liver phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) protein levels and repressed hepatic glucose production in db/db mice. Moreover, increased liver glycogen elevated hepatic ATP content in these animals. However, lipid metabolism was not modified by PTG overexpression. In conclusion, increased liver glycogen content ameliorates the diabetic and obesity phenotype in db/db mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据