4.5 Article

Ionospheric Plasma Depletions at Mars Observed by the MAVEN Spacecraft

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022JE007302

关键词

MAVEN; plasma depletion; ionosphere; plasma bubble; electron temperature; Mars

资金

  1. MSMT INTER-ACTION grant [LTAUSA17070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Martian ionosphere has unique structures different from Earth and Venus, and integrated observations show evidence of ionospheric plasma depletions independent of seasonal variations. These depletions are more prominent on the nightside, possibly occurring in regions with strong crustal magnetic fields, and are bubble-like structures elongated horizontally.
The Martian ionosphere, modulated by the solar wind from the topside and remnant crustal magnetic fields close to the surface, possesses unique structures different from Earth and Venus. Integrated observations by the plasma and magnetic field instruments onboard the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution spacecraft show evidence of ionospheric plasma depletions, independent of seasonal variations at Mars. During such depletions, the density of all ionospheric ion species is reduced by more than an order of magnitude, and, at the same time, the electron temperature increases abruptly. An automated algorithm for the identification of such plasma depletions is developed. Altogether, as many as 1,125 events are identified in 8,618 orbits available from October 2014 to May 2021. A statistical investigation of these events reveals that they are more prominent on the nightside, where they seem to occur primarily in the southern hemisphere, possibly in regions with strong crustal magnetic fields. While the dayside events occur mainly at altitudes above about 250 km, nightside event altitudes are typically lower. Considering the relation between spacecraft velocity and observed event duration, we suggest that the depletions are bubble-like structures, more elongated horizontally than vertically. A possible mechanism of their formation is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据