4.5 Review

Recent Advances in the Use of Dimethyl Sulfoxide as a Synthon in Organic Chemistry

期刊

TOPICS IN CURRENT CHEMISTRY
卷 380, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s41061-022-00411-8

关键词

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); Aprotic polar solvent; Reaction medium; Synthon; Progress

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21676076, 21878071, 21971060]
  2. Hu-Xiang High Project of Hunan Province [2018RS3042]
  3. Recruitment Program for Foreign Experts of China [WQ20164300353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent progress in organic synthesis using dimethyl sulfoxide as a synthon, covering literature from 1 January 2016 to 11 May 2022. The reaction involves transferring units of dimethyl sulfoxide to target molecules, playing a significant role in organic synthesis.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), as extremely important aprotic polar solvent and reaction medium, has attracted widespread attention from chemists in recent years due to its wide range of uses and the multiple functions it displays in various chemical processes. Especially in the past decade, dimethyl sulfoxide has become increasingly favored as a synthon in organic chemistry, resulting in great progress in this research field. In this context, this review provides a comprehensive summary of the literature on the recent progress in organic synthesis using dimethyl sulfoxide as a synthon, covering all the reports from 1 January 2016 to 11 May 2022. This type of reaction is mainly performed by transferring one or more units of dimethyl sulfoxide, such as oxygen (-O-, =O), methyl (-CH3), methylene (-CH2-), methylidene (=CH2), methine (=CH-), donor of formylation (-CHO), sulfur (-S-), methylthio (-SMe), methyl sulfoxide (-SOMe), donor of methyl thiomethylation (-CH2SMe), or donor of methyl sulfoxide methylation (-CH2SOMe), to the target molecules. At the same time, we hope that this review will stimulate future studies and promote developments in this area. [GRAPHICS]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据