4.7 Article Data Paper

High-resolution global maps of tidal flat ecosystems from 1984 to 2019

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01635-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Google Earth Engine Research Award
  2. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award - Australian Government [DE190100101]
  3. Australian Research Council [DE190100101] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents globally consistent data on the occurrence of tidal flats and assesses their accuracy using machine learning classification. The maps generated have shown high accuracy and can be used to measure and monitor various processes affecting coastal ecosystems.
Assessments of the status of tidal flats, one of the most extensive coastal ecosystems, have been hampered by a lack of data on their global distribution and change. Here we present globally consistent, spatially-explicit data of the occurrence of tidal flats, defined as sand, rock or mud flats that undergo regular tidal inundation. More than 1.3 million Landsat images were processed to 54 composite metrics for twelve 3-year periods, spanning four decades (1984-1986 to 2017-2019). The composite metrics were used as predictor variables in a machine-learning classification trained with more than 10,000 globally distributed training samples. We assessed accuracy of the classification with 1,348 stratified random samples across the mapped area, which indicated overall map accuracies of 82.2% (80.0-84.3%, 95% confidence interval) and 86.1% (84.2-86.8%, 95% CI) for version 1.1 and 1.2 of the data, respectively. We expect these maps will provide a means to measure and monitor a range of processes that are affecting coastal ecosystems, including the impacts of human population growth and sea level rise. Measurement(s) ecosystem occurrence Technology Type(s) earth observation Sample Characteristic - Environment tidal flats center dot coastal wetlands Sample Characteristic - Location global

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据