4.7 Article Data Paper

Sharkipedia: a curated open access database of shark and ray life history traits and abundance time-series

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01655-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shark Conservation Fund
  2. Save Our Seas Foundation
  3. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1556779]
  4. Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation at Virginia Tech
  5. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council
  6. Canada Research Chair program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sharkipedia is a curated open-source database and research initiative developed to make all published biological traits and population trends of sharks and rays accessible. It has the potential to support fisheries management, conservation efforts, and test hypotheses of vertebrate macroecology and macroevolution.
A curated database of shark and ray biological data is increasingly necessary both to support fisheries management and conservation efforts, and to test the generality of hypotheses of vertebrate macroecology and macroevolution. Sharks and rays are one of the most charismatic, evolutionary distinct, and threatened lineages of vertebrates, comprising around 1,250 species. To accelerate shark and ray conservation and science, we developed Sharkipedia as a curated open-source database and research initiative to make all published biological traits and population trends accessible to everyone. Sharkipedia hosts information on 58 life history traits from 274 sources, for 170 species, from 39 families, and 12 orders related to length (n = 9 traits), age (8), growth (12), reproduction (19), demography (5), and allometric relationships (5), as well as 871 population time-series from 202 species. Sharkipedia relies on the backbone taxonomy of the IUCN Red List and the bibliography of Shark-References. Sharkipedia has profound potential to support the rapidly growing data demands of fisheries management, international trade regulation as well as anchoring vertebrate macroecology and macroevolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据