4.7 Article

Shining a light on SSP4: A comprehensive analysis and biological applications for the detection of sulfane sulfurs

期刊

REDOX BIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102433

关键词

SSP4; Sulfane sulfurs; Fluorescent probe; S-persulfidation

资金

  1. NSF [CHE2100870]
  2. NIH [R01GM125968, R35HL135775, 5U01HL143365]
  3. American Society of Hematology Scholar Award
  4. Ministry of Edu- cation, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) , Japan [18H05277, 21H05258, 21H05263, 22K19397, 19K07554, 22K06893]
  5. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) , CREST Grant, Japan [JPMJCR2024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fluorescent probe SSP4 exhibits high selectivity and sensitivity to sulfane sulfurs in biological systems, even in the presence of interfering species. Protocols for detecting persulfidated proteins and bioimaging sulfane sulfurs have been developed using SSP4, leading to the discovery of new findings in the field.
Fluorescent probes are useful tools for the detection of sulfane sulfurs in biological systems. In this work, we report the development of SSP4, a widely used probe generated in our laboratory. We describe its evolution, preparation, and physical/chemical properties. Fluorescence analyses of SSP4 determined its high selectivity and sensitivity to sulfane sulfurs, even with the interfering presence of other species, such as amino acids and metal ions. Protocols for using SSP4 in a relatively quick and simple manner for the detection of persulfidated proteins, including papain, BSA, and GAPDH were developed. The method was then applied to human protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), leading to the discovery that persulfidation can occur at PDI???s non-active site cysteines, and that PDI reductase activity is affected by sulfane sulfur treatment. Protocols for using SSP4 for the bioimaging of exogenous and endogenous sulfane sulfurs in different-cell lines were also established. These results should guide further applications of SSP4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据