4.5 Article

Engineering Resilience Quantification and System Design Implications: A Literature Survey

期刊

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
卷 138, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4034223

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation through Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) award [CMMI-1351414]
  2. Department of Transportation through University Transportation Center (UTC) Program
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1351414] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A resilient system is a system that possesses the ability to survive and recover from the likelihood of damage due to disruptive events or mishaps. The concept that incorporates resiliency into engineering practices is known as engineering resilience. To date, engineering resilience is still predominantly application-oriented. Despite an increase in the usage of engineering resilience concept, the diversity of its applications in various engineering sectors complicates a universal agreement on its quantification and associated measurement techniques. There is a pressing need to develop a generally applicable engineering resilience analysis framework, which standardizes the modeling, assessment, and improvement of engineering resilience for a broader engineering discipline. This paper provides a literature survey of engineering resilience from the design perspective, with a focus on engineering resilience metrics and their design implications. The currently available engineering resilience quantification metrics are reviewed and summarized, the design implications toward the development of resilient-engineered systems are discussed, and further, the challenges of incorporating resilience into engineering design processes are evaluated. The presented study expects to serve as a building block toward developing a generally applicable engineering resilience analysis framework that can be readily used for system design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据