4.6 Review

Long-term ceramic matrix composite for aeroengine

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CERAMICS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 1343-1374

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-022-0611-5

关键词

high degree of densification; matrix cracking stress; self-healing; duration; silicon carbide ceramic matrix composite (CMC-SiC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [92060202, 51632007, 51872229, 51521061]
  2. 111 Project of China [B08040]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-VI-0007-0077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review proposes three strategies to prolong the service life of CMC-SiC thermal-structure components and discusses important factors such as densification, matrix cracking stress, and self-healing component introduction.
Three strategies were proposed to prolong the service life of continuous fiber-reinforced silicon carbide ceramic matrix composite (CMC-SiC), which served as thermal-structure components of aeroengine at thermo-mechanical-oxygenic coupling environment. As for some thermal-structure components with low working stress, improving the degree of densification was crucial to prolong the service life, and the related process approaches were recited. If the thermal-structure components worked under moderate stress, the matrix cracking stress (sigma(mc)) should be improved as far as possible. The fiber preform architecture, interface shear strength, residual thermal stress, and matrix strengthening were associated with sigma(mc) in this review. Introducing self-healing components was quite significant with the appearance of matrix microcracks when CMC-SiC worked at more severe environment for hundreds of hours. The damage can be sealed by glass phase originating from the reaction between self-healing components and oxygen. The effective self-healing temperature range of different self-healing components was first summarized and distinguished. The structure, composition, and preparation process of CMC-SiC should be systematically designed and optimized to achieve long duration target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据