4.6 Article

Far from home: Infrastructure, access to essential services, and risk perceptions about hazard weather events

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103185

关键词

Infrastructure; Access; Emergency services; Natural disaster; Hazard events; Climate change

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1832662]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1832662] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the impact of access to essential facilities and emergency services on individuals' risk perceptions during hazard weather events. The findings demonstrate that restricted access and views of local infrastructure conditions are important predictors of increased concerns during natural disasters.
This study explores the role of access to essential facilities and emergency services during hazard weather events in shaping individuals' risk perceptions. We develop a framework in which resi-dents' views of required actions facing extreme weather are influenced by their level of access to essential facilities to obtain medical and emergency services. The effect of access is comple-mented by perceptions about the status of local infrastructure conditions as enabling access. Us -ing a sample of Texas residents collected during April 2021, we demonstrate the role of restricted access and views of local infrastructure conditions as important predictors of increased concerns during natural disasters. The results demonstrate the effects of factors such as access and status of local infrastructure on the risk assessments of individuals in vulnerable communities who face in-creased risks from extreme weather. Accordingly, the findings advance our understanding of the unexplored relationship between access of essential facilities and risk perceptions, and could in-form disaster managers and public officials regarding the importance of evaluating access as an element of public risk perceptions facing extreme weather events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据