4.6 Article

Psychological resilience of children in a multi-hazard environment: An index-based approach

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103397

关键词

Disaster preparedness; Children disaster risk reduction; Children disaster resilience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Children are the most vulnerable to disasters and this study proposes a framework to measure their psychological resilience by incorporating mental health, attitude, and awareness. The framework was validated through the construction of assessment indicators and a survey conducted in disaster-prone communities. Results show significant variations in children's psychological resilience among different areas, indicating that it is not solely intrinsic and can be influenced by external stressors and effective disaster preparedness.
Children are psychologically most vulnerable to disasters. To quantitatively measure children's psychological resilience to disaster, this study proposes a children's resilience framework incorporating three components: mental health, attitude, and awareness. The proposed framework was applied and found effective by constructing Children Psychological Disaster Resilience Assessment Index. A questionnaire survey was conducted among children and their parent(s), in four disaster-prone communities of Peshawar, Pakistan. The result shows significant variations in the psychological resilience of children among the four areas. It is evident that a child's psychological resilience is an inherent characteristic, but it is not fixed or purely based upon intrinsic factors. It can be suppressed by various life stressors and enhanced with effective psychological disaster preparedness that enables children to adapt well to new perceived realities of life. The proposed framework and assessment methodology can be easily adapted and applied to quantify the psychological resilience of children and identify the precise component or set of indicators that can be improved for disaster risk reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据