4.8 Review

IL-7: A promising adjuvant ensuring effective T cell responses and memory in combination with cancer vaccines?

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1022808

关键词

IL-7; adjuvant; cancer vaccines; T cell immune response; T cell memory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing
  3. Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical High-end Talent Project
  4. Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission
  5. CQMU Program for Youth Innovation in Future Medicine
  6. [81871653]
  7. [cstc2021jsyj-yzysbAX0018]
  8. [2022GDRC012]
  9. [KJZD-K202100402]
  10. [KJQN201900449]
  11. [W0073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer vaccines have shown specificity, effectiveness, and safety as an alternative immunotherapeutic strategy. However, maintaining long-term immune memory, especially T cell memory, after vaccination is still a challenge. IL-7, as an adjuvant, has potential in the development of cancer vaccines.
Cancer vaccines exhibit specificity, effectiveness, and safety as an alternative immunotherapeutic strategy to struggle against malignant diseases, especially with the rapid development of mRNA cancer vaccines in recent years. However, how to maintain long-term immune memory after vaccination, especially T cells memory, to fulfill lasting surveillance against cancers, is still a challenging issue for researchers all over the world. IL-7 is critical for the development, maintenance, and proliferation of T lymphocytes, highlighting its potential role as an adjuvant in the development of cancer vaccines. Here, we summarized the IL-7/IL-7 receptor signaling in the development of T lymphocytes, the biological function of IL-7 in the maintenance and survival of T lymphocytes, the performance of IL-7 in pre-clinical and clinical trials of cancer vaccines, and the rationale to apply IL-7 as an adjuvant in cancer vaccine-based therapeutic strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据