4.5 Article

Classical biological of key horticultural pests in Africa: successes, challenges, and opportunities

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2022.100945

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
  2. Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Fund for International Agricultural Research (FIA), Germany [81132021, 81157481, 81250394]
  3. Biovision Foundation, Switzerland,Tuta IPM [BV DPP-012/2019-2021]
  4. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation
  5. section for research, innovation, and higher education, Norway [RAF-3058 KEN-18/0005]
  6. Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) , United Kingdom
  7. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) , Sweden
  8. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) , Switzerland
  9. Kenyan Government, Kenya
  10. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review presents recent advances in classical biological control (CBC) of key horticultural insect pests using parasitoids in Africa. It outlines the key obstacles impeding CBC and the opportunities that could promote CBC in Africa. The review also provides brief highlights on recent scientific and technological advances related to CBC, including modeling, integrative taxonomy and molecular tools, and endosymbionts.
Classical biological control (CBC) is considered a safer and more sustainable alternative for management of alien-invasive species. This review presents recent advances in CBC of key horticultural insect pests using parasitoids in Africa. Several CBC programs have been undertaken targeting different insect pests of both fruits and vegetables, largely yielding outstanding success. Key obstacles impeding CBC and opportunities that could promote CBC in Africa are outlined. Also, very brief highlights on recent scientific and technological advances in modeling, integrative taxonomy and molecular tools, and endosymbionts that relate to CBC are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据