4.6 Article

Reaction-Time-Dependent Opto-Electrical Properties of Graphene Oxide

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12091303

关键词

graphene oxide; reaction time; optical; structural; modified Hummer's; electrical

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Malaysia [FRGS/SG06 (02)/1287/2015(04)]
  2. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R19]
  3. Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, UTAR Research Fund [IPSR/RMC/UTARRF/2022-C1/L12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A modified Hummer's method was used to synthesize graphene oxide (GO) in a reaction-time-dependent manner, and the drop-casting method was used to coat GO films on a glass substrate. Various techniques were employed to study the morphological, structural, optical, and electrical properties of GO. It was found that the amount of oxygen functional groups and the resistivity of the as-deposited films increased with increasing reaction time. Based on morphological and optical data, the optimized reaction time was determined to be 48 hours.
The reaction-time-dependent synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) was carried out using a modified Hummer's method. The drop-casting method was used to coat GO films on a glass substrate. Various techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, UV-Vis spectroscopy (UV-Vis), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and current-voltage characteristics, were performed to obtain the morphological, structural, optical, and electrical properties of GO. Morphological structural observations revealed that more oxygen functional groups were present as the reaction time increased from 24 to 96 h, which was confirmed by the optical properties of GO thin films. The resistivity of the as-deposited films increased from 9.74 x 10(6) to 26.85 x 10(6) omega center dot cm as the reaction time increased. The optimized reaction time with a resistivity of 12.13 x 10(6) omega center dot cm was 48 h, as demonstrated by morphological and optical data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据