4.6 Article

Succinyl and Adipoyl Dihydrazones: A Solid-State, Solution and Antibacterial Study

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12081175

关键词

hydrazones; tautomerism; structural analysis; NMR spectroscopy; antibacterial activity

资金

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2016-06-4221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of aryl-functionalized alkyl dihydrazones were synthesized and characterized in terms of structure and properties. The compounds showed good thermal stability and antibacterial activity.
A series of aryl-functionalized alkyl dihydrazones was prepared by condensation of succinyl or adipoyl dihydrazide and selected ortho-hydroxybenzaldehydes (2-hydroxybenzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde, 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyde, and 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde) in solution. The obtained products were structurally characterized in the solid state by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD), thermal analysis (TGA-DSC), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and in DMSO-d(6) solution by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques. Combined FTIR and crystal structure data point to a N-NH-C=O tautomeric form of the hydrazone parts as well as the enol-imino tautomeric form of the aldehyde residues and a robust trans-syn conformation for the structurally investigated ones. While the molecules retain the same tautomeric form in the DMSO-d(6) solution, they adopt several conformations, due to rotations around C-ar-C, C-N, and N-N bonds. The compounds show exceptional thermal stability, with a complex degradation pattern. Slight differences in thermal behavior correlate to alkyl chain length and aryl substituents. The in vitro cytotoxic activity of prepared dihydrazones was evaluated on THP-1 and HepG2 cell lines, while their antibacterial activity was tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Moraxella catarrhalis bacteria. All compounds proved to be non-cytotoxic, and some exhibited moderate antibacterial activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据