4.6 Article

Low Cycle Fatigue Crack Damage Behavior of TC21 Titanium Alloy with Basketweave Microstructure

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12091211

关键词

fatigue damage; low cycle fatigue; titanium alloy; crack propagation

资金

  1. Rand D plan for key areas in Guangdong Province [2020B010186001]
  2. Core technology research project of Foshan [1920001000412]
  3. Basic and applied basic research fund project in Guangdong Province [2020b15120093]
  4. Science and technology project in Guangdong [2020B121202002]
  5. R and D plan for key areas in Jiangxi Province [20201BBE51009, 20212BBE51012]
  6. Foshan material computing Engineering Technology Research Center and Innovation driven project of science and technology plan in Jiangxi Yichun

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crack initiation, propagation, and damage behaviors of TC21 alloy with basketweave microstructure under low cycle fatigue (LCF) were investigated. The process of LCF damage was observed, and in-situ SEM fatigue analysis was conducted. The study found that LCF crack damage showed different sensitivity to cyclic stress, with different initiation and propagation patterns.
Low cycle fatigue (LCF) crack initiation, propagation and damage behaviors of TC21 alloy with basketweave microstructure were investigated. The process of LCF damage was observed by a long-focus optical microscopic imaging system, and fatigue crack propagation was analyzed through in-situ SEM fatigue. The results indicated that LCF crack damage displayed different sensitivity to cyclic stress. LCF microcracks initiated from slip bands and propagated through the microcrack coalescences at high stress, while LCF cracks tended to initiate at the alpha(L)/beta interface and connect with these interface microcracks. Furthermore, the LCF damage model was established on the basis of Lemaitre damage theory. When the maximum stress exceeded yield stress, LCF damage increased sharply and fatigue life decreased significantly, which agreed with experiment data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据