4.6 Article

Analysis of Coating Loss from Coated Stainless Steel Orthodontic Wire

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12199497

关键词

coated wire; coating loss; metal allergy

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [K20K187740]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The leaching of metal ions from orthodontic appliances is problematic for metal-allergic patients. This study examined the resilience of coated stainless steel wire to low pH, bending, and brushing. The results indicated that different coatings have different levels of resilience.
The leaching of metal ions from orthodontic appliances into the oral cavity is problematic for metal-allergic patients. Non-metal orthodontic appliances, such as plastic and ceramic brackets and elastomeric materials, have been clinically used and are effective for treatment of metal-allergic patients. However, only a few types of orthodontic wire are available for use in patients with metal allergies, thus restricting the establishment of orthodontic force systems in these patients. Wire surfaces can be coated with various substances to prevent leaching of metal ions. However, detachment of the coating may occur during orthodontic procedures, resulting in metal ion leaching from the substrate material. This study was performed to examine the resilience of various types of coated stainless steel wire to low pH, bending, and brushing. Wire surface characteristics were examined by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The degree of coating detachment due to bending of the wire was quantified by determining the change in the amount of metal ions eluted from the site of the bend immersed in hydrochloric acid. Exposure of the substrate metal by brushing was investigated by energy dispersive spectrometry. The results indicated that polyethylene naphthalate (PEN)-coated wire is resilient to bending, while gold (Au)-coated and titanium nitride (TiN)-coated wires are resilient to brushing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据