4.6 Article

Lateral Capacity of URM Walls: A Parametric Study Using Macro and Micro Limit Analysis Predictions

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app122110834

关键词

bond patterns; limit analysis; parameter influence; in-plane masonry wall

资金

  1. FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the RD Unit ISISE [UIDB/04029/2020]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [833123]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [833123] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research compares the influence of texture on the lateral capacity of masonry walls using macro and micro limit analysis. The results show that the aspect ratios of the panels and blocks have the most significant effect on the results, while the bond types have no significant effect.
This research investigates the texture influence of masonry walls' lateral capacity by comparing analytical predictions performed via macro and micro limit analysis. In particular, the effect of regular and quasi-periodic bond types, namely Running, Flemish, and English, is investigated. A full factorial dataset involving 81 combinations is generated by varying geometrical (panel and block aspect ratio, bond type) and mechanical (friction coefficient) parameters. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach is used to investigate one-way and two-way factor interactions for each parameter in order to assess how it affects the horizontal load multiplier. Macro and micro limit analysis predictions are compared, and the differences in terms of mass-proportional horizontal load multiplier and failure mechanism are critically discussed. Macro and micro limit analysis provide close results, demonstrating the reliability of such approaches. Furthermore, results underline how the panel and block aspect ratio had the most significant effect on both the mean values and scatter of results, while no significant effect could be attributed to the bond types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据